Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Heckendorn Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1961No. 42,516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

In this workmen’s compensation case the commissioner found that the relationship of employer and workman did not exist between the claimant and the respondent, Heckendorn Manufacturing Company, at the time the claimant sustained personal injury resulting in the loss of his right eye, and denied an award of compensation. Upon appeal, the district court found that the claimant’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment with the respondent and affirmed the order of the commissioner denying compensation.

The parties concede…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Daugherty v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Heer v. Hankamer Excavating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Phillips v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Morgan v. Auto Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API