Legal Opinion

Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1969No. 45,485PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This is an action for compensation brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The question on appeal is whether claim for compensation was served within the time fixed by the Act. The trial court found the claim not timely filed, and the workman, Martin A. Riedel, has appealed. We will refer to appellant as claimant, or Riedel; to the appellees, collectively, as respond ents; to appellee Gage Plumbing and Heating Company, Inc., as employer, or Gage; and to appellee Alliance Mutual Casualty Company, as carrier, or Alliance.

Many of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Fitzwater v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Mooney v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Mein v. Meade CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service StoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Frame, Administrator v. BaumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Curtis v. FredenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Olson v. HarshmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Armstrong v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Matthews v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API