Legal Opinion

Lemonious v. Burns

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 15, 1991No. 8662PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s1 motion to set aside the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly granted the motion to set aside the verdict because its decision was based on a question of fact that is constitutionally reserved for the jury’s determination. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the jury could have reasonably and logically inferred from the evidence presented at trial that the defendant had constructive notice of the defective and dangerous condition of a public…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Camp v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Hanauer v. CosciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Berndston v. AnninoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Long v. Savin Rock Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Bambus v. Bridgeport Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Ormsby v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Lemonious v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Beach v. Regional School District Number 13Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Consorte v. Novicki, No. Cv 97 0353863 (Feb. 6, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API