Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States' Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Bunn-O-Matic Corporation’s (“Defendant” or “Bunn-O-Matic”) motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Bryan Real’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Real”) patent infringement claim. Bunn-O-Matic argues that Real’s patent is invalid as a matter of law for failure to satisfy the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1. Real contends that Bunn-O-Matic’s motion for summary judgment should be denied because there are genuine issues of material fact for trial. During the oral argument on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sightsound. Com Inc. v. N2K, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003