Legal Opinion

Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 8, 2000No. 99 C 3751PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MORTON DENLOW, United States' Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Bunn-O-Matic Corporation’s (“Defendant” or “Bunn-O-Matic”) motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Bryan Real’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Real”) patent infringement claim. Bunn-O-Matic argues that Real’s patent is invalid as a matter of law for failure to satisfy the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1. Real contends that Bunn-O-Matic’s motion for summary judgment should be denied because there are genuine issues of material fact for trial. During the oral argument on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sightsound. Com Inc. v. N2K, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API