Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. Sanborn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1928No. 26,988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Upon a hearing for confirmation of assessments against the several parcels of land, of the different owners, benefited by the construction of the Belt Line-Phalen and Hazel Park sewer system, the court found the assessments exceeded the benefits as to certain parcels owned by respondents and reduced the same to an amount which would not exceed the benefits and as so reduced confirmed them. From the judgment entered on the findings, the city of St. Paul appeals.

The lands involved are in the northeasterly corner of the city now used, if at all, for a golf course, truck farming and pasture. Most…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. City of Globe v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kipp v. ClingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Burger v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Marthaler MacHine & Engineering Co. v. MeyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Hartle v. City of GlencoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. American Oil Company v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Crutchfield v. NashMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API