Legal Opinion

Murk v. Aronsen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1961No. 35031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The plaintiff Ebba Murk was injured on premises belonging to the defendant Congregation Bikur Cholim, where she had been employed by the Aronsens to *786work as a banquet waitress. At the close of all of the evidence, her suit against Congregation Bikur Cholim was dismissed and a judgment against the defendants Aronsen was directed in her favor. She assigns error to the action of the court in dismissing her case against the owner of the premises.

The evidence disclosed that Congregation Bikur Cholim, hereafter referred to as the respondent, had employed the Aronsens, doing business as the Aronsen…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Douglass v. Peck & Lines Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Gambella v. John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Burke v. IrelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Epperly v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Srader v. Pecos Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Citizen's Utility, Inc. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Straw v. Esteem Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API