Legal Opinion
Minter v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 21, 1979No. 57939, 57940PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
Appellees brought this action for damages and attorney fees, alleging both fraud and negligence. Based upon the jury’s answers to interrogatories, the trial court entered judgment in favor of appellees.
U. S. Gold, one of the defendants below, dealt in gold concentrate. In March, 1975, appellant McConnell, a U. S. Gold salesman entered into negotiations with appellee Powell, a potential customer. Following these negotiations, a contract was signed in late March or early April by McConnell on behalf of U. S. Gold, and by Powell on behalf of appellees. Under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shaw v. Cook County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Reeves v. Williams & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co. v. GoodroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Romedy v. Willett Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Hill v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Home Insurance Co. v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Bayliner Marine Corp. v. PranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Simpson v. Georgia State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Segars v. ClelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Basic Four Corp. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.