Legal Opinion

Kane v. Matson Navigation Company, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 12, 2022No. 3:22-cv-04583Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MARK KANE, Case No. 22-cv-04583-WHO 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 8 v. DISMISS 9 MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 20 INC., et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Defendants Matson Navigation Company, Inc. (“Matson”) and Theodore Bernhard move 13 to dismiss a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) arising from plaintiff Mark Kane’s termination 14 from his job aboard a ship that Matson owned and Bernhard captained, because Kane’s claims are 15 preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”). Kane’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API