Kane v. Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MARK KANE, Case No. 22-cv-04583-WHO 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 8 v. DISMISS 9 MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 20 INC., et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Defendants Matson Navigation Company, Inc. (“Matson”) and Theodore Bernhard move 13 to dismiss a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) arising from plaintiff Mark Kane’s termination 14 from his job aboard a ship that Matson owned and Bernhard captained, because Kane’s claims are 15 preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”). Kane’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.