Legal Opinion
Bailey v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 18, 2008No. 26031-3-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
191 P.3d 1285 (2008)
Anne BAILEY and Sam Bailey, wife and husband, Respondents,
v.
STATE of Washington; Eastern Washington University; Jolynn Rogers; Mary Voves; Anthony Flinn, Respondents, and
Karen Lindholdt, Petitioner.
No. 26031-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
September 18, 2008.
Laurel Hobbs Siddoway, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Petitioner.
Amy Christina Clemmons, Washington State Attorney General, William J. Powell, Powell Kuznetz & Parker PS, Spokane, WA, for Respondents.
KULIK, J.
¶ 1 Anne Bailey was terminated from her position as the risk manager at Eastern Washington…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Phoenix Trading, Inc. v. Loops LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Lowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- City Of Seattle, App/cross-resp V. Ballard Terminal Railroad Co. L.l.c., Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Delashaw v. Seattle Times CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.