Legal Opinion
Qualls v. Rumsfeld
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 27, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-2113 (RCL)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, David Qualls and six John Does (“Doe plaintiffs”), are soldiers currently serving in Iraq or currently solving in Kuwait but en route to Iraq. Each has been serving in the Army pursuant to an enlistment contract that specifies a term of service. Defendants, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, have extended plaintiffs’ terms of service against plaintiffs’ wishes by means of the Stop Loss program. Plaintiffs challenge these involuntary extensions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Doe v. StegallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- U.S. Office of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Doe v. CabreraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Doe v. Pittsylvania CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
- Doe v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Klayman v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.