Legal Opinion
Cruz v. Local Union Number 3 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1993No. CV 89-4240 (ADS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This action was initially commenced with the plaintiffs’ assertion of two causes of action: (1) under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (“WARN”) against the employer, Robert Abbey, Inc.; and (2) under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act for the alleged breach by both the employer and by the defendant Local Union Number 3 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“the Union”) of the duty of fair representation. The action against the employer was settled for the sum of $110,000 on or…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cruz v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Socorro Cruz v. Local Union Number 3 Of The International Brotherhood Of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Perdue v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- DeVito v. Hempstead China Shop, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.