Becher v. Shaw
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Carey, J., entered January 18, 1906, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing a garnishment proceeding, after a trial upon the defendants’ controversion of the answer of the garnishee.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
On the 27th day of March, 1903, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants Henry A. Shaw and wife for the recovery of the sum of $296.90 with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 24, 1903. At the time of the commencement of such action, a writ of garnishment was sued out and served on the garnishee defendant, Benesh. The garnishee answered that he was conditionally indebted to the defendants in the principal action in the sum of $500, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from June 2, 1902, on account of the balance due on the purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jarvais v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Cullen v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Watkins v. BlatschinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Schuttloffel v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La CroixSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Lien v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Field v. GoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Hills v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.