Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Fowler v. Moskowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Henry Moskowitz and others, from an orderof the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 19th day of April, 1916, granting the relators’ motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the municipal civil service commission to admit the relators and others similarly situated to a competitive examination for the position of chief examiner, civil service commission.

1Per curiam

In January, 1916, the civil service classification of the city of New York included a “chief examiner, civil service commission,” and twenty-nine persons respectively classified by the commission as “civil service examiner.” This official classification did not distinguish between three persons having office titles of “assistant chief examiner,” ten examiners paid by yearly salary, and sixteen examiners employed by the day, who assist when the work is too great for the salaried force, being also called on to act as to examinations involving technical knowledge and special skill. Some of these…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. FineganNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBrideNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBrideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBrideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Story v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API