Patton v. Continental Casualty Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
The defendant is a private corporation Laving its •principal office and place of business in the city of Chicago, State of Illinois. Harry L. Patton obtained from defendant a policy of insurance on his life bearing date August 23, 1905. He was ¿t that time a freight brakeman on the Norfolk & Western Railroad, remaining in the service of that company in that capacity until the date of his death, November 10, 1905.
The policy provided on its face for the payment of a weekly indemnity of $10 in the event the insured should be injured while the contract was in force, and for the payment of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LawrenceMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
- Whitlow v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- State ex rel. Watkins v. North American Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beautytuft, Inc., Jorges Carpet Mills, Inc., and Moccasin Bend Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Factory Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Rishmiller v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Cartmell v. Mechanics' Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Alwood v. Buffalo Hardwood Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.