Legal Opinion

People in Interest of MCL

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1983No. 83CA0278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this paternity action, P.L., the mother, appeals from the order of the trial court refusing to review the findings and recommendations of the commissioner in juvenile court because she failed to file a request for review within five days after the conclusion of the hearing as required under § 19-1-110, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.). We set aside the order.

After it was established in the paternity proceeding that D.B.W. was the father of M.C.L., a hearing concerning the issue of support was held before a commissioner on September 28, 1982. At the beginning of the hearing, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massey v. District Court in & for Tenth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. JOSLIN DRY GOODS COMPANY v. Villa Italia, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Sayat Nova, Inc. v. District Court in and for Pitkin CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of T.E.M., T.E.M., W.B.M., Jr., T.B.M., and C.E.M., Children, Upon the Petition of Denver Department of Human Services, and Concerning W.B.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. In re Marriage of BrantleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. M.E.G. v. R.B.D.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. C.T.R. ex rel. E.R. v. R.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People Ex Rel. TemColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API