Massey v. District Court in & for Tenth Judicial Dist.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
In an original proceeding, Robert G. Massey, an indigent defendant, seeks to prohibit the district court from proceeding further without first appointing a psychiatrist of his own choosing to examine him and determine his competency to proceed. Massey has been examined by two court-appointed psychiatrists who have expressed the opinion that he is competent to proceed. The trial court ruled that Massey was not entitled to a further psychiatric examination by the psychiatrist which he selected unless good cause was shown. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.
The factual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The People v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. PhelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States of America Ex Rel. Ronald James Dessus v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- McGarty v. O'brien, WardenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Colorado Common Cause v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.