Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 12, 2017No. 15-2364PPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarbadoro, District Judge

I agree with the majority that the applicability of the § 1 exemption is a threshold matter for the district court to decide. Where we part company is at the point where the majority decides to take on the difficult issue as to whether transportation-worker agreements that purport to create independent-contractor relatiom ships are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act. That, in my view, is an issue we need not decide now. Instead, if it ultimately proves necessary to determine whether the § 1 exemption covers all such independent-contractor agreements, the district court should do so in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Denmark v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Mandel v. Boston Phoenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Gove v. Career Systems Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API