Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Boston Phoenix, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 3, 2006No. 05-1230PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION *

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

The oenologist’s creed teaches that we should drink no wine before its time. Much the same principle applies to summary judgment; it is a deliciously helpful device if properly timed, but one that can leave a sour taste if brought to bear on an insufficiently fermented record.

This appeal, which follows on the heels of a substantial verdict in a defamation suit, is a paradigmatic example of the point. The briefs before us raise a plethora of First Amendment issues. At the threshold, however, lies the preliminary question on which the appeal ultimately…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Cabán Hernández v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Calvi v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Rodriguez v. Municipality of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Rios-Jimenez v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API