State v. Locklear
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
We find prejudicial error with respect to defendant’s first assignment of error and, therefore, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. In this assignment defendant argues that he was deprived of due process of law by the actions of the trial court regarding the state’s principal witness.
The state’s evidence tended to show that defendant and the state’s witness Mary Hunt Campbell were friends and that they occasionally lived together in Ms. Campbell’s mobile home. On the night in question they had an argument, and Ms. Campbell called the Fairmont police because defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Beaugureau v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. MelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.