Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Neal

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1944No. Crim. 2287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STURTEVANT, J.—

The district attorney filed informations against three defendants, Ray Neal, Robert Sams, and Louis May. In each of the informations each defendant was accused of five different offenses. Three counts were accusations of rape, section 261 of the Penal Code, one was an accusation of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and one was an accusation of abduction for defilement, section 265 of the Penal Code. The charges against Neal and the charges against Sams were consolidated for the purposes of a trial. The jury returned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. GillilandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. WardripCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. PalacioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. People v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API