Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Craine v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1943No. 28996Published

1ConcurrenceSteinert, J.

(concurring) — I concur with the majority, but for reasons somewhat different from those expressed in the majority opinion.

As stated in Thurston County Chapter, American Nat. Red Cross v. Department of Labor & Industries, 166 Wash. 488, 7 P. (2d) 577, the workmen’s compensation act repeatedly uses the word “industries,” and the whole theory of that act is to the effect that it was intended to apply to a trade or business which is operated for profit or pecuniary gain. That concept and that interpretation of the act were later forcefully emphasized in the Carsten, Dalmasso, and Jannak cases,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Thurston Co. Chap. Amer. Etc. v. Dept. L. I.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Thurston County Chapter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Haller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Thompson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API