Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1938No. 26853. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

The adjutant general of the national guard made application to the department of labor and industries to have the personnel of the guard, both enlisted and commissioned, accorded the benefits of the workmen’s compensation act.

In support of his application, he alleged that the officers and enlisted men of the guard are employees of the state and engaged in a dual capacity, that is, as state militia and as peace officers; that, in either capacity, they are engaged in extrahazardous employment within the intent and meaning of the act. He states that, in his opinion, the activities of members of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Blynn v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of RedmondWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bridges v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Craine v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API