Legal Opinion

Husske v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 13, 1996No. Record 951880PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

The primary issue we consider in this appeal is whether an indigent defendant has made the particularized showing necessary to require the Commonwealth, under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the federal Constitution, to supply at its expense a DNA expert to assist the defendant.

I

Paul Josef Husske was convicted in a bench trial of breaking and entering with intent to commit rape and the offenses of forcible sodomy, rape, and robbery. He was sentenced as follows: 20 years’ imprisonment, suspended after serving 10 years, for breaking and entering with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Porter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. Lonnie Weeks, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Juniper v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Lenz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Winston v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API