Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 16, 1979No. 1259PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

The principal question involved in this case is whether the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act 1 applies to a building and construction contract which has been substantially performed.

On September 9, 1976, appellant, Alan Baldwin, d/b/a Alan Baldwin, Builder, entered into a written contract with appellee, Roland D. Smith, to construct a house on land owned by Smith. Under the terms of the contract Baldwin was to construct the house in a good and workmanlike manner according to plans and specifications supplied by the Veterans Administration for and in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Tenneco Oil Company v. Padre Drilling CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Roanoke Hospital Ass'n v. Doyle & Russell, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Linch v. Paris Lumber and Grain Elevator Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Arnold v. CaprielianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Valencia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  3. Murphy v. CanionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Widmer v. StampsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Laredo Independent School District v. Trevino, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API