v. Cooke
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
dictating the specifics of how the legislature might comply with the reading requirement, it is the judiciary’s prerogative and responsibility to declare that the legislature did not comply with that requirement in this case. The supreme court therefore agrees with the district court’s determination that the unintelligible sounds produced by the computers on the Senate floor on March 11, 2019, did not fulfill the reading requirement. However, unlike the district court, the supreme court stops short of telling the legislature how to comply with the reading requirement. It was not within the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rucho v. Common CauseSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bluebird v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Jared S. Polis, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado v. Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a Colorado nonprofit corporation Patrick Neville, Representative Lori Saine, House Minority Leader and Dave Williams, Representative.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- Unite for Colorado, Petitioner: v. Colorado Department of State; Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as the Colorado Secretary of State; and Andrew Kline, in his official capacity as the Colorado Deputy Secretary of State.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026