Legal Opinion
Brown v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 23, 2015No. 178, 2014PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRINE, Chief Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
The defendant-appellant, Ira Brown, filed this appeal from a Superior Court order denying his first motion for postcon-viction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 (“Rule 61”). Brown raises two issues on appeal. First, he contends that he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence of misconduct at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (“OCME”). Although Brown did not raise this claim in his Rule 61 motion (because the problems at the OCME did not come to light until almost a year after Brown filed his Rule 61 motion), we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Somerville v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- United States v. MoussaouiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Aricidiacono v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.