Legal Opinion
General Petroleum Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 18, 1937No. Civ. No. 11410PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant, City of Los Angeles, after the trial court sustained an objection to the introduction of evi*334dence on the ground that the complaint as amended failed to state a cause of action against defendant municipality.
The essential facts alleged in the amended complaint are:
On May 21, 1932, the SS. Hahonesan Marti, pursuant to rules and regulations of the board of harbor commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, paid defendant municipality a fee for the purpose of obtaining a pilot for said steamship from the open sea to docks of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Coleman v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- City of Philadelphia v. GavagninCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
- Benton v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Societa Per Azioni De Navigazione Italia v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Sanders v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- General Petroleum Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ravettino v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- City of Long Beach v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.