Legal Opinion

Speck v. Sarver

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1942No. S. F. 16529Published

1Opinion of the Court

20 Cal.2d 585 (1942)

ALICE SPECK et al., Respondents,

v.

PHILIP R. SARVER et al., Appellants.

S. F. No. 16529.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 23, 1942.

Francis N. Foley for Appellants.

Norman S. Menifee for Respondents.

CURTIS, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for damages for injuries arising out of an automobile collision.

The two automobiles involved approached from opposite directions on a narrow, winding highway and met in a head-on collision on a curve in the road. There was no white line marking the middle of the highway. A bank extended upward on the east or…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API