Legal Opinion
Laseter v. Hyde
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 1, 1933No. 7873PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeCLENDON, Chief Justice.
Appellants (plaintiffs in error) were sureties upon a sequestration replevy-bond in a suit by Hyde against Laseter, upon a promissory note, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage upon a Ford truck. Laseter defaulted and judgment was rendered against him and his sureties for $382.60, the amount of principal, interest, and attorney’s fees due on the note. The only question which the appeal presents is the validity of the judgment as to the sureties.
The truck was replevied on October 31, 1931; and judgment was rendered on December 14, 1931. It'recites that the truck at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watts v. OverstreetTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Webb-North Motor Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Mutual Inv. Corp. v. HaysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Norwood v. Inter-State National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Riggle v. Automobile Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Mortgage Corp. v. SamuellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Commercial Securities Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Wallace v. BursonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Baum v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Pinkard v. Hobbs Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.