Legal Opinion

Mutual Inv. Corp. v. Hays

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1933No. 1436-6080PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, the Mutual Investment Corporation, brought this suit against defendant in error C. L. Quig to recover principal, interest, and attorneys’ fees on a promissory note, executed by the latter for the sum of $1,578.16, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the payment of said note.

Plaintiff in error obtained possession of the automobile covered by the mortgage under a writ' of sequestration, issued at its instance, and the defendant in error Quig re-plevied the same. The replevy bond was in the sum of $2,000 executed by Quig as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cabell v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Schulte v. Republic Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Sutherland v. CabinessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schweizer v. AdcockTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. American Mortgage Corp. v. SamuellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Roye v. Silver Dollar Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Kelley v. Central Texas Bus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Shellhammer v. CaruthersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API