Brown v. Borchers Ford, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Attorney General presents a question not previously raised in the litigation and thus not ruled upon by the Court of Appeals. Specifically, the Attorney General argues that when he investigates consumer fraud on his own.under R. C. 1345.07, without referral from the Director of Commerce, no requirement of requesting assurance of voluntary compliance is necessary because the provisions of R. C. 1345.06 do not apply.
Certification of the record of the case to the Supreme Court, because of a conflict between judgments of the Courts of Appeals upon any question, brings the entire case, not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Couk v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
- Pettibone v. McKinnonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. VolpeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Beifuss v. Westerville Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Michele Adkins, Michele Adkins v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company Insurance Company of North America First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.