Legal Opinion
Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Staudt
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 8, 1942No. 36PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
This suit in equity was brought by the plaintiff in the District Court for the Southern District of New York charging the defendants, as co-partners in business under the trade name of Address-O-Plate Company, with contributory infringement of claims 1, 3, 13 and 14 of United States Patent No. 2,030,865 which was granted to plaintiff’s predecessor as the assignee of Walter T. Gollwitzer on Jan. 18, 1936 for an address plate. The District Court construed the claims so narrowly that what the defendants have done could not be contributory infringement if that construction of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Blake v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Essex Razor Blade Corp. v. Gillette Safety Razor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Hawley Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Winslow Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Gauge Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
- De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.