Legal Opinion
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Hawley Hardware Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 3, 1933No. 303PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This suit involves a charge of infringement of the Gaisman patent, No. 1,633,739, claims 1 and 3, and the Thompson patent, No. 1,815,745. The infringement consists of selling razor blades manufactured by the Clark Blade & Razor Company of Newark, N. J., and sold by the defendant in the district of Connecticut. No charge is made that the appellant or the Clark Blade & Razor Company manufactured or sold safety rar zors; their sales were blades adapted for use in the Gillette razors, and this is the only act of infringement to be considered.
Claim 1 of the Gaisman patent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- United States Light & Heat Corp. v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Landis MacHinery Co. v. Chaso Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. StaudtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Essex Razor Blade Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1935
- Parkinson Heating Corp. v. GoldensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937