Legal Opinion
United States v. 8 Gilcrease Lane
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 10, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1345 (RMC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., renews his motion to vacate an Order approving his release of claims, see Dkt. # 41, in this civil in rem forfeiture proceeding. Mr. Bowdoin seeks to restore his right to litigate his claim to the defendant properties, arguing that his prior counsel gave him bad advice and the Government tricked him into releasing his claims. See Bowdoin’s Mots, to Rescind Withdrawal of Claims [Dkt. ## 66, 67, and 131]. As Mr. Bowdoin’s own descriptions of events fail to support these arguments, and there is no other reason to grant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Good Luck Nursing Home, Inc. D/B/A Magnolia Gardens Nursing Home v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- More v. O'neillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Green v. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (Afl-Cio)District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Hazel v. LvesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013