Montcalm v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante was denied, and it appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict.
The action was one to recover for wrongful death. The facts were in substance these: Duluth avenue runs north and south through the westerly part of the city of Grand Rapids, and is crossed at right angles by the tracks of defendant. The depot and principal business parts of the city extend several blocks to the east of Duluth avenue. That street has considerable travel, but there are no sidewalks north of the railroad crossing. The most southerly track is the main track. The next…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hendrickson v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Schneider v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Gilbert v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Klotz v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Lewis v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hendrickson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927