Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hendrickson v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1927No. 25,846Published

1DissentStone, J.

I dissent, but not upon any issue peculiar to these crossing cases. With respect to them, some of my views are not concurred in by a majority of the court and I consider myself bound accordingly. But there are two features of this decision which appeal to me as important and with respect to which 1 could not be frank without expressing the reasons for my disagreement.

Obviously, as said by Mr. Justice Holt, the testimony upon which the verdict must rest is that to the effect “that it was so dark that the oncoming locomotive with the headlight unlit could not be seen by the driver of the truck…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Montcalm v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API