Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance v. Hertz Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 28, 1991No. C2-90-673PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
This action was filed pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, by Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company (hereinafter “Cincinnati Insurance” or “Plaintiff”), an insurance carrier authorized and empowered to issue policies of insurance to motorists residing within the state of Ohio, against Defendant Hertz Corporation (hereinafter “Hertz” or “Defendant”), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1);…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Passamano v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Van Vonno v. Hertz CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Tyler v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bracken v. DASCO Home Medical Equipment, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.