Eder v. Beal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents us with a novel question: must Pennsylvania comply with the notice provisions governing the termination of an optional medical assistance program funded under Title XIX of the Social Security Act,1 even when the discriminatory operation of the program has been held to have violated federal law?2 The district court, while holding that Pennsylvania had not complied with the notice provisions of the Act, nonetheless held that the illegality of the program itself, inter alia, prevented it from enforcing compliance with the notice…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sobky v. SmoleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Ollie Smith v. Jeffrey C. Miller, Director, Illinois Department of Public AidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Roe v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Coalition for Basic Human Needs v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Meyers v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.