Legal Opinion

Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Nunn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 17133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANSON, V. C. J.

The Consolidated Flour Mills Company, a corporation, sued the defendant, N. W. Nunn, on two alleged causes of action. The trial court sustained a demurrer to both, and the plaintiff having elected to stand on the petition, judgment was entered dismissing the same, from which the plaintiff appeals. In the first count, plaintiff declared upon a written contract of purchase and sale of certain mill run products, to wit, flour, shorts, bran: said contract being dated November 2, 1923. After pleading the said contract, plaintiff asserts:

“That according to the terms and conditions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Wm. B. Hughes Produce Co. v. PulleyUtah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffin Grocery Co. v. Kingfisher Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. J. W. Cherry & Co. v. Consolidated Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Hooper v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API