Hooper v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
There are two reasons why I can not concur in the opinion of the majority. First, I think the contract is too vague, uncertain and indefinite as to the quantity of grapefruit and oranges purchased to be enforced, and, second, if there was a valid contract then it was breached by appellee when he refused to let appellants' hands pick fruit on November 30, 1946.
The subject matter of the contract is described as grapefruit and oranges "as listed below." There is no statement as to the quantity sold, it is not described as all the fruit grown by Everett Bell, or the fruit grown on the farm of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1873
- Price v. AtkinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Price v. WeisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Durkee Famous Foods Inc. v. Selig Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. NunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.