Legal Opinion
Wm. B. Hughes Produce Co. v. Pulley
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1916No. 2775PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District; Hon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by William B. Hughes, doing business as William B. Hughes Produce Company, against George H. Pulley. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant.appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
This is an action for breach of contract. The action is based upon a certain contract, which was introduced in evidence by the plaintiff as his Exhibits A and B. Exhibit A reads:
*545“February 4, 1911.
“Received from Wm. B. Hughes Produce Company of Salt Lake City, Utah, ten and no 100 dollars in part payment of six hundred bushels or more of first-class potatoes at $1.25 per hundred sacked, to be deilvered f. o. b. cars at American Fork within SO days from date. Balance of payment to be made on the delivery of said potatoes/
Geo. H. Pulley.”
Exhibit B is as follows:
“For R. N. Z. potatoes. Price…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Blyth-Farco Co. v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Russell v. WittIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hawkins v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Wright v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. NunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926