Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Ulland

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1994No. Civ. 3-94-162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff Ross Fuller, as Trustee of the International Association of Entrepreneurs of America Benefit Trust (the “Trustee”) commenced this declaratory judgment action against James E. Ulland, Commissioner of Commerce of the State of Minnesota (the “Commissioner”); he seeks declaratory and other relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3) (1988). Before the Court is the Commissioner’s Motion, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (e), for Judgment on the Pleadings.

Background

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. UllandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Fuller v. BartlettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  3. Fuller Ex Rel. International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of America Benefit Trust v. UllandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Reyes v. BayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API