Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Bartlett
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 20, 1995No. Civ. L-94-2443, L-94-2460PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have instituted these actions to prevent the Maryland Insurance Admimstration (“MIA”) from enforcing its regulations against them. At tMs stage of the proceedings, plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction against MIA, and MIA has resisted. For the reasons below, the Court shall DENY plaintiffs’ motions and DISMISS the cases in accordance with the principles of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).
I. BACKGROUND
A. Fuller v. Bartlett, No. L-9b-2W
The relevant facts in both cases are undisputed. Ross N. Fuller, the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Partners Healthcare System, Inc. v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Kaplan v. CareFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- John Doe v. Angela NastaseDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Larsen v. Cigna Healthcare Mid-Atlantic, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002