Legal Opinion

Rounthwaite v. Rounthwaite

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1902No. L. A. No. 1150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Riverside County; J. S. Noyes, Judge. Action by Margaret Rounthwaite against Samuel Rounthwaite. From a judgment in favor of defendant and an order denying a motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Plaintiff sues on three counts to recover for money alleged to have been loaned by plaintiff to defendant: (1) For money loaned by plaintiff to defendant more than four years before the commencement of the action, to wit, $1,000, at five per cent interest, which defendant has acknowledged in writing within four years, and alleging a payment of $300 in the year 1898, leaving due $850; (2) for the same amount, and that defendant promised in writing to pay plaintiff’s claim within four years last past; (3) on an account stated June 15, 1899, showing a balance due plaintiff *880of $871.14,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Priest v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Knox v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wilson v. Cross & Co.California Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. President & Board of Trustees of California College v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API