State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Pinkley
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
Appeal by the State Highway Commission in an eminent domain proceedings. The first issue presented is whether the trial court erred in denying condemnation for the reason that the evidence was insufficient to show that the Commission and the owners of the lands sought to be condemned could not “ * * * agree upon the proper compensation to be paid, * * as required by § 523.010, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S.
The Commission’s petition, filed on June 11, 1970, in general is in the conventional form. It was alleged therein that the Commission, referred to as the relator, sought to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brown v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Shelby County R-IV School District v. HermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Mickelberry's Food Products Co. v. HaeussermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State ex rel. Wood v. SchweickardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Maryland Plaza Redevelopment Corp. v. GreenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Western Robidoux Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- City of Cape Girardeau v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Missouri Outdoor Advertising Ass'n v. HighwaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.