Legal Opinion
Haworth v. Central National Bank of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 7, 1989No. 66234PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
The dispositive question of first impression is whether a municipal police officer qualifies as a “government authority” under the Financial Privacy Act (Act), 6 O.S. 1981 § 2201-2204 thus triggering these provisions. Section 2203 of the Act prohibits the release by a financial institution of any information to a “government authori ty” unless the institution has either the written consent of the customer for the specific record requested, or it has been served with a subpoena for the specific record pursuant to § 2204. We find that a municipal police officer, who solicits…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cashen v. SpannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Nikrasch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Suburban Trust Co. v. WallerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Popper v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wynkoop v. Mayor of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Diane McGeorge v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Oklahoma City Zoological Trust v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Oklahoma City Zoological Trust v. STATE EX REL. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS BD.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- CIG Exploration, Inc. v. HillDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.