Legal Opinion

Suburban Trust Co. v. Waller

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1979No. 274, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

Street and Smith 1 would have probably entitled this case as, “The Bank That Talked Too Much.” The matter presents us with a novel question of the existence and scope of a bank’s duty of confidentiality concerning the affairs of its depositors. 2

The appellee, Maurice Waller (Waller) deposited $800 in his account at the Suburban Trust Company (Bank). Because of the actions of a security official, Waller was arrested on a charge of robbery with a dangerous and deadly weapon. The facts surrounding the deposit led a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to withdraw, in the form of a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Peterson v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Pontbriand v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Nikrasch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API