Suburban Trust Co. v. Waller
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.
Street and Smith 1 would have probably entitled this case as, “The Bank That Talked Too Much.” The matter presents us with a novel question of the existence and scope of a bank’s duty of confidentiality concerning the affairs of its depositors. 2
The appellee, Maurice Waller (Waller) deposited $800 in his account at the Suburban Trust Company (Bank). Because of the actions of a security official, Waller was arrested on a charge of robbery with a dangerous and deadly weapon. The facts surrounding the deposit led a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to withdraw, in the form of a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Peterson v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Pontbriand v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Nikrasch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.