Legal Opinion

People v. Mc Nab

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Donald J. Mark, J.

This is an application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1) to vacate verdicts of guilty to the crimes of rape, first degree, and assault, second degree, upon the ground that *613the court made two erroneous rulings during the course of the trial.

The defendant was charged with seven counts of rape, first degree, two counts of sodomy, first degree, and one count of assault, second degree, as a result of alleged sexual assaults committed upon the victim during an approximate six-hour period; two rapes and one sodomy allegedly occurred in the defendant’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. Yut Wai TomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. ChinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. People v. NufferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Austin v. BascaranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. People v. HalmondNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API