Legal Opinion

Woodcock v. Bennet

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1823PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Chancery. The respondent# October, 1819, filed his bill, in the Court below, against the appellant, for the specific performance of articles of agreetnent, dated the 30Ih day of November, 1815, by which the appellant, for the consideration of $560, secured to be paid, Covenanted to release and quit claim to PhiúehUs Bennet$ Phinehas Bennet,jun. and the respondent, on or before the Is# December, 1816, the right, title and interest tifthe appellant; to…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Court of Chancery. The respondent# October, 1819, filed his bill, in the Court below, against the appellant, for the specific performance of articles of agreetnent, dated the 30Ih day of November, 1815, by which the appellant, for the consideration of $560, secured to be paid, Covenanted to release and quit claim to PhiúehUs Bennet$ Phinehas Bennet,jun. and the respondent, on or before the Is# December, 1816, the right, title and interest tifthe appellant; to three undivided fourth parts of a parcel of land, lying in lot 94, at Ithica, ih the town of Ulysses, subject to…

1Opinion of the CourtWoodworth, J.

The first objection js, that the consideratio'n stated in the agreement, has not been paid. So far as respects the order drawn on Pelton, this is true. It is equally clear, as a general rule, that the instrument on which a party seeks relief in equity, will not be specifically enforced, unless it be supported by a valuable, or, at least, what equity calls a meritorious consideration. (1 Mad. 126. 4 John. Ch. 500.)

The appellant cannot, however, rest his defence on this ri 77 ground ; for having accepted a draft on Pelton, he was bound to use ordinary diligence, before any legal or just claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Jackson v. SebringNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Jackson ex dem. M'Crea v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  4. James v. M'KernonNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  5. Reynolds v. CorpNew York Supreme Court · 1805

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Morgan v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Fenno v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  3. Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hawley v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Mason v. MessengerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API