Legal Opinion

Asgill v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1932No. 3292PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an appeal pursued in forma pau-peris. The transcript of record and brief of appellant’s counsel are typewritten. Part of the testimony is in single space and other portions in double space, and the number of erasures and intei lineations appearing in the transcript all together contribute to considerable difficulty in its consideration. Wo call attention to these faets for the purpose of illustrating the lack of care with which rec ■ ords of this kind_ are frequently presented and for the purpose of emphasizing the propriety of having the court furnished with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Asgill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  5. Hostetter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. DeBose v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API